HAROLD BERGLUND, still life
painter, on Cezanne

|
|
|
|
|
July 2010
Jean and I visited Aix-en-Provence. We saw Cézânne’s
studio and Montagne Sainte Victoire. |
|
detail of a Cezanne painting |
Cezanne is an interesting case of the
errors of art history. In his letter to Emile Bernard from |
|
He has
been wrongly attributed to be a "brain" painter, but due to his
devotion to truthfull rendition of the visual reality
at a time when his eyesight was failing and he could not see the colors at the edges of objects and, therefore, did not
paint them, giving the paintings an abstraction quality that was not his
intention. To quote the same letter again "Now, being old, nearly
seventy years, the sensation of color, which give
light, are the reason for the abstractions which prevent me from either
covering my canvas or continuing the delimitation of the objects when their
points of contact are fine and delicate; from which it results that my image
or picture is incomplete."* Cezanne worked slowly and thought a great
deal about his painting but that does not mean he intended to do more than
render what he saw. The
challenge of rendering what we see is indeed demanding. It requires ignoring
the mechanism of color constancy, sharpening the
vision for nuances and training the ability to see the relationship of every
part to the whole. Harold
Berglund 2002.3.10 *[Nochlin, Linda. Impressionism and Post-Impressionism 1874-1904 Sources and Documents, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1966 p. 95 (from John Rewald, ed. Paul Cezannes Letters, trans. Marguerite Kay, London, Bruno Cassirer, 1941)] |
|